• Molimo kopiraјtе / zaliјеpitе poruku o grеšci koјu viditе na еkranu, ako je ima.

Here is one example when moving around locos (top) and another when choosing the advance 1 steel track action (bottom):

imgur.com/3NubNUr

For the first example, the only valid destination for the 4 loco that is currently being moved is to replace the 3 loco. The highlight on the 6 loco and on the construction site are misleading. The highlight on the 4 loco itself would be better if it was different as its role is different.

For the second example, none of the place highlighted can actually be clicked to complete the action.
The only valid place to click that actually works is the first position on the Osaka line.

-------------------------------

This leads also to a generic problem with this implementation in regards to the movement of tracks and industry tokens.

As a generic rule, the current position of the track or industry token is highlighted and you click there to advance it. BUT, there are situation where you have to click where you want the token to go (for instance when you want your industry token to ignore a placed factory and take the shortcut) and there is nothing to tell you that.

This makes people believe that they cannot do certain actions when in fact they can, it is "just" that the interface is opaque and not consistant.

I don't know what the global solution is. Maybe we should *always* target and highlight the destination rather than current "the origin except in a few situations". That or simply make the highlights a lot smarter so as to conform with the actual places where we can click.

As a side note, I think the highlights should be a bit more solid and visible.

• Molim vas, obјasnitе šta stе htеli da uraditе, šta stе radili i šta sе dеsilo

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?

Here is one example when moving around locos (top) and another when choosing the advance 1 steel track action (bottom):

imgur.com/3NubNUr

For the first example, the only valid destination for the 4 loco that is currently being moved is to replace the 3 loco. The highlight on the 6 loco and on the construction site are misleading. The highlight on the 4 loco itself would be better if it was different as its role is different.

For the second example, none of the place highlighted can actually be clicked to complete the action.
The only valid place to click that actually works is the first position on the Osaka line.

-------------------------------

This leads also to a generic problem with this implementation in regards to the movement of tracks and industry tokens.

As a generic rule, the current position of the track or industry token is highlighted and you click there to advance it. BUT, there are situation where you have to click where you want the token to go (for instance when you want your industry token to ignore a placed factory and take the shortcut) and there is nothing to tell you that.

This makes people believe that they cannot do certain actions when in fact they can, it is "just" that the interface is opaque and not consistant.

I don't know what the global solution is. Maybe we should *always* target and highlight the destination rather than current "the origin except in a few situations". That or simply make the highlights a lot smarter so as to conform with the actual places where we can click.

As a side note, I think the highlights should be a bit more solid and visible.

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.

Here is one example when moving around locos (top) and another when choosing the advance 1 steel track action (bottom):

imgur.com/3NubNUr

For the first example, the only valid destination for the 4 loco that is currently being moved is to replace the 3 loco. The highlight on the 6 loco and on the construction site are misleading. The highlight on the 4 loco itself would be better if it was different as its role is different.

For the second example, none of the place highlighted can actually be clicked to complete the action.
The only valid place to click that actually works is the first position on the Osaka line.

-------------------------------

This leads also to a generic problem with this implementation in regards to the movement of tracks and industry tokens.

As a generic rule, the current position of the track or industry token is highlighted and you click there to advance it. BUT, there are situation where you have to click where you want the token to go (for instance when you want your industry token to ignore a placed factory and take the shortcut) and there is nothing to tell you that.

This makes people believe that they cannot do certain actions when in fact they can, it is "just" that the interface is opaque and not consistant.

I don't know what the global solution is. Maybe we should *always* target and highlight the destination rather than current "the origin except in a few situations". That or simply make the highlights a lot smarter so as to conform with the actual places where we can click.

As a side note, I think the highlights should be a bit more solid and visible.

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Šta је prikazano na еkranu kada stе bili blokirani (Prazan еkran? Dio intеrfејsa igrе? Poruka o grеšci?)

Here is one example when moving around locos (top) and another when choosing the advance 1 steel track action (bottom):

imgur.com/3NubNUr

For the first example, the only valid destination for the 4 loco that is currently being moved is to replace the 3 loco. The highlight on the 6 loco and on the construction site are misleading. The highlight on the 4 loco itself would be better if it was different as its role is different.

For the second example, none of the place highlighted can actually be clicked to complete the action.
The only valid place to click that actually works is the first position on the Osaka line.

-------------------------------

This leads also to a generic problem with this implementation in regards to the movement of tracks and industry tokens.

As a generic rule, the current position of the track or industry token is highlighted and you click there to advance it. BUT, there are situation where you have to click where you want the token to go (for instance when you want your industry token to ignore a placed factory and take the shortcut) and there is nothing to tell you that.

This makes people believe that they cannot do certain actions when in fact they can, it is "just" that the interface is opaque and not consistant.

I don't know what the global solution is. Maybe we should *always* target and highlight the destination rather than current "the origin except in a few situations". That or simply make the highlights a lot smarter so as to conform with the actual places where we can click.

As a side note, I think the highlights should be a bit more solid and visible.

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Koji dio pravila nije primijenjen u BGA prilagodbi

Here is one example when moving around locos (top) and another when choosing the advance 1 steel track action (bottom):

imgur.com/3NubNUr

For the first example, the only valid destination for the 4 loco that is currently being moved is to replace the 3 loco. The highlight on the 6 loco and on the construction site are misleading. The highlight on the 4 loco itself would be better if it was different as its role is different.

For the second example, none of the place highlighted can actually be clicked to complete the action.
The only valid place to click that actually works is the first position on the Osaka line.

-------------------------------

This leads also to a generic problem with this implementation in regards to the movement of tracks and industry tokens.

As a generic rule, the current position of the track or industry token is highlighted and you click there to advance it. BUT, there are situation where you have to click where you want the token to go (for instance when you want your industry token to ignore a placed factory and take the shortcut) and there is nothing to tell you that.

This makes people believe that they cannot do certain actions when in fact they can, it is "just" that the interface is opaque and not consistant.

I don't know what the global solution is. Maybe we should *always* target and highlight the destination rather than current "the origin except in a few situations". That or simply make the highlights a lot smarter so as to conform with the actual places where we can click.

As a side note, I think the highlights should be a bit more solid and visible.

• Da li je kršenje pravila vidljivo na ponovljenom snimku igre? Ako je odgovor da, na kom broju poteza?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Koji ste potez htjeli učiniti?

Here is one example when moving around locos (top) and another when choosing the advance 1 steel track action (bottom):

imgur.com/3NubNUr

For the first example, the only valid destination for the 4 loco that is currently being moved is to replace the 3 loco. The highlight on the 6 loco and on the construction site are misleading. The highlight on the 4 loco itself would be better if it was different as its role is different.

For the second example, none of the place highlighted can actually be clicked to complete the action.
The only valid place to click that actually works is the first position on the Osaka line.

-------------------------------

This leads also to a generic problem with this implementation in regards to the movement of tracks and industry tokens.

As a generic rule, the current position of the track or industry token is highlighted and you click there to advance it. BUT, there are situation where you have to click where you want the token to go (for instance when you want your industry token to ignore a placed factory and take the shortcut) and there is nothing to tell you that.

This makes people believe that they cannot do certain actions when in fact they can, it is "just" that the interface is opaque and not consistant.

I don't know what the global solution is. Maybe we should *always* target and highlight the destination rather than current "the origin except in a few situations". That or simply make the highlights a lot smarter so as to conform with the actual places where we can click.

As a side note, I think the highlights should be a bit more solid and visible.

• Što ste pokušali učiniti kad ste pokrenuli ovu akciju u igri?

• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе to pokušali (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• U kojem trenutku tokom igre se problem pojavio (što si iduće trebao učiniti)?

Here is one example when moving around locos (top) and another when choosing the advance 1 steel track action (bottom):

imgur.com/3NubNUr

For the first example, the only valid destination for the 4 loco that is currently being moved is to replace the 3 loco. The highlight on the 6 loco and on the construction site are misleading. The highlight on the 4 loco itself would be better if it was different as its role is different.

For the second example, none of the place highlighted can actually be clicked to complete the action.
The only valid place to click that actually works is the first position on the Osaka line.

-------------------------------

This leads also to a generic problem with this implementation in regards to the movement of tracks and industry tokens.

As a generic rule, the current position of the track or industry token is highlighted and you click there to advance it. BUT, there are situation where you have to click where you want the token to go (for instance when you want your industry token to ignore a placed factory and take the shortcut) and there is nothing to tell you that.

This makes people believe that they cannot do certain actions when in fact they can, it is "just" that the interface is opaque and not consistant.

I don't know what the global solution is. Maybe we should *always* target and highlight the destination rather than current "the origin except in a few situations". That or simply make the highlights a lot smarter so as to conform with the actual places where we can click.

As a side note, I think the highlights should be a bit more solid and visible.

• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе pokušali izvršiti akciјu igrе (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Molimo da opišеtе problеm prikaza. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Here is one example when moving around locos (top) and another when choosing the advance 1 steel track action (bottom):

imgur.com/3NubNUr

For the first example, the only valid destination for the 4 loco that is currently being moved is to replace the 3 loco. The highlight on the 6 loco and on the construction site are misleading. The highlight on the 4 loco itself would be better if it was different as its role is different.

For the second example, none of the place highlighted can actually be clicked to complete the action.
The only valid place to click that actually works is the first position on the Osaka line.

-------------------------------

This leads also to a generic problem with this implementation in regards to the movement of tracks and industry tokens.

As a generic rule, the current position of the track or industry token is highlighted and you click there to advance it. BUT, there are situation where you have to click where you want the token to go (for instance when you want your industry token to ignore a placed factory and take the shortcut) and there is nothing to tell you that.

This makes people believe that they cannot do certain actions when in fact they can, it is "just" that the interface is opaque and not consistant.

I don't know what the global solution is. Maybe we should *always* target and highlight the destination rather than current "the origin except in a few situations". That or simply make the highlights a lot smarter so as to conform with the actual places where we can click.

As a side note, I think the highlights should be a bit more solid and visible.

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?

Here is one example when moving around locos (top) and another when choosing the advance 1 steel track action (bottom):

imgur.com/3NubNUr

For the first example, the only valid destination for the 4 loco that is currently being moved is to replace the 3 loco. The highlight on the 6 loco and on the construction site are misleading. The highlight on the 4 loco itself would be better if it was different as its role is different.

For the second example, none of the place highlighted can actually be clicked to complete the action.
The only valid place to click that actually works is the first position on the Osaka line.

-------------------------------

This leads also to a generic problem with this implementation in regards to the movement of tracks and industry tokens.

As a generic rule, the current position of the track or industry token is highlighted and you click there to advance it. BUT, there are situation where you have to click where you want the token to go (for instance when you want your industry token to ignore a placed factory and take the shortcut) and there is nothing to tell you that.

This makes people believe that they cannot do certain actions when in fact they can, it is "just" that the interface is opaque and not consistant.

I don't know what the global solution is. Maybe we should *always* target and highlight the destination rather than current "the origin except in a few situations". That or simply make the highlights a lot smarter so as to conform with the actual places where we can click.

As a side note, I think the highlights should be a bit more solid and visible.

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.

Here is one example when moving around locos (top) and another when choosing the advance 1 steel track action (bottom):

imgur.com/3NubNUr

For the first example, the only valid destination for the 4 loco that is currently being moved is to replace the 3 loco. The highlight on the 6 loco and on the construction site are misleading. The highlight on the 4 loco itself would be better if it was different as its role is different.

For the second example, none of the place highlighted can actually be clicked to complete the action.
The only valid place to click that actually works is the first position on the Osaka line.

-------------------------------

This leads also to a generic problem with this implementation in regards to the movement of tracks and industry tokens.

As a generic rule, the current position of the track or industry token is highlighted and you click there to advance it. BUT, there are situation where you have to click where you want the token to go (for instance when you want your industry token to ignore a placed factory and take the shortcut) and there is nothing to tell you that.

This makes people believe that they cannot do certain actions when in fact they can, it is "just" that the interface is opaque and not consistant.

I don't know what the global solution is. Maybe we should *always* target and highlight the destination rather than current "the origin except in a few situations". That or simply make the highlights a lot smarter so as to conform with the actual places where we can click.

As a side note, I think the highlights should be a bit more solid and visible.

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?