#9837: "When using the investigator, it sometimes gives false information. "
O čеmu је ovaј izvеštaј?
Što se desilo ? Molim vas odaberite ispod
Što se desilo ? Molim vas odaberite ispod
Provjerite postoji li već izvješće o istoj temi
Ako sе slažеtе, molimo vas da GLASATЕ za ovaј izvеštaј. Izvеštaјi sa naјvišе glasova ćе imati prioritеt!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljan opis
-
• Molimo kopiraјtе / zaliјеpitе poruku o grеšci koјu viditе na еkranu, ako je ima.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Molim vas, obјasnitе šta stе htеli da uraditе, šta stе radili i šta sе dеsilo
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Šta је prikazano na еkranu kada stе bili blokirani (Prazan еkran? Dio intеrfејsa igrе? Poruka o grеšci?)
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Koji dio pravila nije primijenjen u BGA prilagodbi
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Da li je kršenje pravila vidljivo na ponovljenom snimku igre? Ako je odgovor da, na kom broju poteza?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Koji ste potez htjeli učiniti?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Što ste pokušali učiniti kad ste pokrenuli ovu akciju u igri?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. -
• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе to pokušali (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v66
-
• U kojem trenutku tokom igre se problem pojavio (što si iduće trebao učiniti)?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе pokušali izvršiti akciјu igrе (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Molimo da opišеtе problеm prikaza. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v66
Prijavite povijest
I think I understand why it's making that mistake, nonetheless it's a serious bug and right now I am asking all of my opponents to verify my information as well as their own to prevent suffering from the glitch.
So, to improve the wording of the game log, I see two options:
1. "$player sent an investigator to $location. *New* matches: ...."
2. "$player sent an investigator to $location. Matches: $correctnumber"
If I go for 2., would it confuse players if it says, e.g. "matches: 1 exact, 1 adjacent" an then only 1 token appears on the investigator tile, because the other token is already on the aspect tile? Obviously moving the token from a tile to the investigator is not an option as this would reduce the amount information again (which doesn't make sense).
would be taken into consideration by the player holding the Case cards, making sure that a specific tile did not receive another disc or cube.“
So, if going by that, one could argue that the game log should as closely as possible imitate a real player, then the log should say something like: “Place 1 disc onto the investigator.”, really only talking about the new tokens.
“$player‘s investigator finds new information at $location: X disc(s), Y cube(s).”
#55
The answer is China Town, Knuckles, Bank job.
and I put my investigator on China Town square, which is neighbor of both Knuckles and Bank Job(there's a disc on Bank job). The right info should be "1 disc, 2 cubes", but it only shows "1 disc, 1 cube".
#77
The answer is Doc, Trocadero, Jewellery Heist
I put my investigator on the square below Jewellery Heist(already had a disc on it), which is not neighbor others, but this time I got a cube, indicated "Jewellery Heist".
"If you already have discs and/or cubes in the location then these would be taken into consideration by the player holding the Case cards, making sure that a specific tile did not receive another disc or cube."
On #40141874 #55
I already got a cube on that location and it's should be take into consideration, no duplicate info should given by investigator.
Is there a way to make it more visually obvious when this happens? Perhaps animate the cube moving from the location to the investigator then back to the location?
Dodaj nešto ovom izvješću
- Drugi stol / potez
- Je li problem rješen pritiskom na F5?
- Da li se problem pojavio više puta? Uvijek? Nasumično?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
