#141522: "As requested: Cards which didn't score correctly in my game"
O čеmu је ovaј izvеštaј?
Što se desilo ? Molim vas odaberite ispod
Što se desilo ? Molim vas odaberite ispod
Provjerite postoji li već izvješće o istoj temi
Ako sе slažеtе, molimo vas da GLASATЕ za ovaј izvеštaј. Izvеštaјi sa naјvišе glasova ćе imati prioritеt!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljan opis
-
• Molimo kopiraјtе / zaliјеpitе poruku o grеšci koјu viditе na еkranu, ako je ima.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Molim vas, obјasnitе šta stе htеli da uraditе, šta stе radili i šta sе dеsilo
Noted above inline.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. Ako imaš print screen ove greške (dobra praksa), možeš da koristiš Imgur.com da bi je okačio, a zatim iskopiraj link ovde.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?
Noted above inline.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Šta је prikazano na еkranu kada stе bili blokirani (Prazan еkran? Dio intеrfејsa igrе? Poruka o grеšci?)
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Koji dio pravila nije primijenjen u BGA prilagodbi
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Da li je kršenje pravila vidljivo na ponovljenom snimku igre? Ako je odgovor da, na kom broju poteza?
Noted above inline.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Koji ste potez htjeli učiniti?
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Što ste pokušali učiniti kad ste pokrenuli ovu akciju u igri?
Noted above inline.
-
• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе to pokušali (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v128
-
• U kojem trenutku tokom igre se problem pojavio (što si iduće trebao učiniti)?
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе pokušali izvršiti akciјu igrе (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?
Noted above inline.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Molimo da opišеtе problеm prikaza. Ako imaš print screen ove greške (dobra praksa), možeš da koristiš Imgur.com da bi je okačio, a zatim iskopiraj link ovde.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. Ako imaš print screen ove greške (dobra praksa), možeš da koristiš Imgur.com da bi je okačio, a zatim iskopiraj link ovde.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
-
• Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?
Noted above inline.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.
All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.
Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.
Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)
Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7
Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10
Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13
Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25
The differential did not change the rest of the game.
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v128
Prijavite povijest
I will begin investigating this.
The pathing algorithm is arduous. I've rewritten it completely and it I still find insidious bugs like this on occasion.
Thank you for your detailed reporting. It helped tremendously.
As a retired software engineer, I can appreciate the complexities involved, and need for good detail in bug reports.
Some of these did not involve changes to the longest path, so I wonder it there might be other things to look at:
While moves 18 and 40 involved changes to the longest path at the time, AND were values that coincided with the path changes, moves 43, 48, and 55 increased the amount of missing points by 5 points at the same time a new berry should have been scoring pointing to a possible issue with berry scoring.
43 also involved changed to the sum for longest path, but 48, and 55 did not, although 55 did cover part of the width of a still counted path segment, but the increase in the score differential (5 vp) indicated a berry missed which was just added.
Hope this helps and curious if you think even 43, 48, and 55 would be fixed as it sounds like they may not be yet.
Since you're technically inclined, you may find it interested to open the browser javascript console and type TBP.players[93239080]["subscore"] to see a breakdown of your score at any point in the game or replay.
Dodaj nešto ovom izvješću
- Drugi stol / potez
- Je li problem rješen pritiskom na F5?
- Da li se problem pojavio više puta? Uvijek? Nasumično?
- Ako imaš print screen ove greške (dobra praksa), možeš da koristiš Imgur.com da bi je okačio, a zatim iskopiraj link ovde.
