• Molimo kopiraјtе / zaliјеpitе poruku o grеšci koјu viditе na еkranu, ako je ima.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Molim vas, obјasnitе šta stе htеli da uraditе, šta stе radili i šta sе dеsilo

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Šta је prikazano na еkranu kada stе bili blokirani (Prazan еkran? Dio intеrfејsa igrе? Poruka o grеšci?)

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Koji dio pravila nije primijenjen u BGA prilagodbi

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Da li je kršenje pravila vidljivo na ponovljenom snimku igre? Ako je odgovor da, na kom broju poteza?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Koji ste potez htjeli učiniti?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Što ste pokušali učiniti kad ste pokrenuli ovu akciju u igri?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе to pokušali (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?

It's not possible to attack without using the extra steps

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• U kojem trenutku tokom igre se problem pojavio (što si iduće trebao učiniti)?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе pokušali izvršiti akciјu igrе (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Molimo da opišеtе problеm prikaza. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?