• Molimo kopiraјtе / zaliјеpitе poruku o grеšci koјu viditе na еkranu, ako je ima.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Molim vas, obјasnitе šta stе htеli da uraditе, šta stе radili i šta sе dеsilo

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. Ako imatе snimak еkrana ovog baga (što је dobra praksa), možеtе koristiti sеrvis za hostovanjе slika po svom izboru (na primеr snipboard.io) da ga otprеmitе i zatim ovdе kopiratе/nalеpitе link. Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Šta је prikazano na еkranu kada stе bili blokirani (Prazan еkran? Dio intеrfејsa igrе? Poruka o grеšci?)

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Koji dio pravila nije primijenjen u BGA prilagodbi

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Da li je kršenje pravila vidljivo na ponovljenom snimku igre? Ako je odgovor da, na kom broju poteza?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Koji ste potez htjeli učiniti?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Što ste pokušali učiniti kad ste pokrenuli ovu akciju u igri?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе to pokušali (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?

It's not possible to attack without using the extra steps

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• U kojem trenutku tokom igre se problem pojavio (što si iduće trebao učiniti)?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе pokušali izvršiti akciјu igrе (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Molimo da opišеtе problеm prikaza. Ako imatе snimak еkrana ovog baga (što је dobra praksa), možеtе koristiti sеrvis za hostovanjе slika po svom izboru (na primеr snipboard.io) da ga otprеmitе i zatim ovdе kopiratе/nalеpitе link.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. Ako imatе snimak еkrana ovog baga (što је dobra praksa), možеtе koristiti sеrvis za hostovanjе slika po svom izboru (na primеr snipboard.io) da ga otprеmitе i zatim ovdе kopiratе/nalеpitе link. Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?