#61176: "Tournaments FAQ is incomplete / outdated"
Što se desilo ? Molim vas odaberite ispod
Što se desilo ? Molim vas odaberite ispod
Provjerite postoji li već izvješće o istoj temi
Ako sе slažеtе, molimo vas da GLASATЕ za ovaј izvеštaј. Izvеštaјi sa naјvišе glasova ćе imati prioritеt!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Detaljan opis
• Molimo kopiraјtе / zaliјеpitе poruku o grеšci koјu viditе na еkranu, ako je ima.
n/a• Molim vas, obјasnitе šta stе htеli da uraditе, šta stе radili i šta sе dеsilo
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v99
• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. Ako imaš print screen ove greške (dobra praksa), možeš da koristiš Imgur.com da bi je okačio, a zatim iskopiraj link ovde.
n/a• Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v99
• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.
n/a• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v99
• Šta је prikazano na еkranu kada stе bili blokirani (Prazan еkran? Dio intеrfејsa igrе? Poruka o grеšci?)
n/a• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v99
• Koji dio pravila nije primijenjen u BGA prilagodbi
n/a• Da li je kršenje pravila vidljivo na ponovljenom snimku igre? Ako je odgovor da, na kom broju poteza?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v99
• Koji ste potez htjeli učiniti?
n/a• Što ste pokušali učiniti kad ste pokrenuli ovu akciju u igri?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе to pokušali (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?
• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v99
• U kojem trenutku tokom igre se problem pojavio (što si iduće trebao učiniti)?
n/a• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе pokušali izvršiti akciјu igrе (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v99
• Molimo da opišеtе problеm prikaza. Ako imaš print screen ove greške (dobra praksa), možeš da koristiš Imgur.com da bi je okačio, a zatim iskopiraj link ovde.
n/a• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v99
• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. Ako imaš print screen ove greške (dobra praksa), možeš da koristiš Imgur.com da bi je okačio, a zatim iskopiraj link ovde.
n/a• Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?
The Tournaments FAQ doc (main post) has not been updated since November 2015. It has outdated, incorrect info and is missing info on updates since then (new types of tournaments, etc.) Also, please add an explanation of the tie-breaker rules for each type of tournament.
Some additional info is found in replies to the original FAQ post, but there are so many pages of replies that the info is scattered throughout, difficult to find, and also not always reliable or accurate.• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v99
• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.
n/a• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?
Google Chrome v99
Prijavite povijest
For example, in a multiplayer-elimination tournament where two out of four players advance to the next round, which two players advance if a game ends in a three-way tie for the win?
Also, is there a different rule in the case where one player is booted so that the remaining three players are deemed to have tied even though one of them might have been way ahead in points?
The software clearly has some rule to deal with these cases (as well as ties in round-robin, Swiss, and single-elimination tournaments). Could a BGA administrator just say what the rules are and add them to the FAQ.
For tie breakers, current practices seem to be:
1) Order of finish in a game that ends automatically due to the allotted time running out for the game is determined by clock time left for each player.
2) For other cases where a tie breaker is needed, either for round advancement in an elimination tournament, or final placement in a non-elimination tournament, age of player accounts is used as the tie breaker. This includes 3+ player elimination games ending due to a player being removed for being out of time, which effectively creates a tie for first place among the remaining players.
Every time a player is disqualified in a game, all remaining players (even those with negative time) are considered tied winners and the ones advancing are chosen inexplicably by the website.
Other users claim the players advancing are the ones with the oldest accounts, others think that they are the ones with the most time remaining, I have noted that they ate the ones who were lucky enough to have been drawn first into the particular game, that is the ones whose names appear first on the particular table.
However, none of the above probable explanations is followed every time.
Hence, it is absolutely vital that:
1. Either the above rule is added to the general Rules FAQ, or
2. An official announcement is made in the Forums, or
3. This rule is clearly stated in EVERY tournament when players apply to participate.
It is too much of a grey zone and it is frustrating to many many players, judging by forum posts.
Thank you.
Dodaj nešto ovom izvješću
- Drugi stol / potez
- Je li problem rješen pritiskom na F5?
- Da li se problem pojavio više puta? Uvijek? Nasumično?
- Ako imaš print screen ove greške (dobra praksa), možeš da koristiš Imgur.com da bi je okačio, a zatim iskopiraj link ovde.