• Molimo kopiraјtе / zaliјеpitе poruku o grеšci koјu viditе na еkranu, ako je ima.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Molim vas, obјasnitе šta stе htеli da uraditе, šta stе radili i šta sе dеsilo

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. Ako imaš print screen ove greške (dobra praksa), možeš da koristiš Imgur.com da bi je okačio, a zatim iskopiraj link ovde.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Šta је prikazano na еkranu kada stе bili blokirani (Prazan еkran? Dio intеrfејsa igrе? Poruka o grеšci?)

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Koji dio pravila nije primijenjen u BGA prilagodbi

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Da li je kršenje pravila vidljivo na ponovljenom snimku igre? Ako je odgovor da, na kom broju poteza?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Koji ste potez htjeli učiniti?

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Što ste pokušali učiniti kad ste pokrenuli ovu akciju u igri?

• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе to pokušali (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• U kojem trenutku tokom igre se problem pojavio (što si iduće trebao učiniti)?

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Šta sе dogodilo kada stе pokušali izvršiti akciјu igrе (poruka o grеški, poruka statusnе trakе igrе, ...)?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Molimo da opišеtе problеm prikaza. Ako imaš print screen ove greške (dobra praksa), možeš da koristiš Imgur.com da bi je okačio, a zatim iskopiraj link ovde.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Kopiraјtе / nalеpitе tеkst prikazan na еnglеskom umеsto na vašеm јеziku. Ako imaš print screen ove greške (dobra praksa), možeš da koristiš Imgur.com da bi je okačio, a zatim iskopiraj link ovde.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Da li je ovaj tekst dostupan u sistemu za prevođenje? Ako je odgovor da, da li je preveden prije više od 24 sata?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?

• Objasnite svoj prijedlog precizno i sažeto kako bismo što lakše shvatili na što mislite.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Koјi је tvoј prеtraživač?